2-3. Since their project is already done, I can not suggest anything anymore. The game is very interactive and simple. It can easily be used by the students. The animations and drawings are very good too.
Monday, November 29, 2010
GROUP EVALUATION: PAPIGURA
1. The group changed from the topics which included cells and body systems into one topic which is the digestive system. So i think they can be able to cover the scope when deadline comes.
2-3. If possible, they should try to make their e-book longer and provide a more thorough explanation because the readers would be very young students. But it is nice that they used a very light approach in presenting their subject matter. The drawings are nice too.
GROUP EVALUATION: KARE
1. The group was able to cover the scope they wanted to achieve which is primarily about graphs. The application they created also has a light approach which is suitable for young grade schoolers that will be using their application.
2-3. I think the project is very well planned and implemented. They also are aligned with the nature theme. :) So i do not have any suggestion or comment regarding their work.
GROUP EVALUATION:WOOF
1. The group stated that they are almost done with the project so i think they have been able to accomplish the things they included in their storyboard. Their scope is kinda broad for it included earth sciences, marine sciences and astronomy.
2-3. I think the scope is a little bit unsuitable with the grade 4 students but it still depends on the content of the game itself. They have aligned their game with the nature theme which i think is very good. I just would like to suggest that they must be a little bit specific with their scope so that it would be easy for the student to play their game. And also, they should prepare questions with a light approach for the players would be young grade 4 students only.
GROUP EVALUATION: M3
1. The group obviously wants to cover the different body systems. If they are going to push through with what is written in their story board, Yes they will be able to achieve their chosen scope but with the presentation, i think there will be a little problem.
2.Choosing the "monster" as the thing to be created by the player, may lead to some misunderstandings. I think it will be a little awkward if a monster will have body organs like that of the humans which in turn can be a little bit misleading. Well, children identify the location of such organs included in a system by pointing at their own bodies. So if they will be presented with a new physical structure (i.e monster) then they may be a little bit confused. But in contrast, i still think it's fun to create your own monster. I also would like to suggest that they align their course ware with the section's nature theme.
GROUP EVALUATION: HEX
link : http://hexgroup.blogspot.com/
1. The group was able to cover the scope that they intended to do for their course ware. It is obvious that they have progressed a lot already. They have prepared the clickables and informations that are necessary for their project.
2-3. Well, The only thing that i can suggest is that they should align their course ware to the nature theme that was chosen for our whole section. With the content, I think it's pretty okay and well prepared.
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
Latest Update
Karl Len Mae Dimla and Arvin Tomacruz are the only remaining members of Team Base 10.
As Ma'am shelly advised us, We are still trying to cut down the scope of our Game (application). But at the moment, we are going to stick with our earlier storyboard.
We already have coded some of the minor parts of the game like the Introduction part, male/female identification ,choosing the character and about the authors. The game parts are still on the process of coding by Arvin Tomacruz. And the rest of the game parts such as high scores, help and game main page wherein the mini games are to be displayed are going to be coded by Karl Len Dimla.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)